graduate student from 01.01.2024 until now
Russian Federation
The purpose of the study is to identify the prerequisites for the use of mobile hardware-software systems with feedback for assessing and developing speed-strength qualities of skiers. Research methods: analysis of literary sources, questionnaires, and methods of mathematical-statistical data processing. Research results and conclusions. A high demand for wireless feedback systems in speed-strength training of skiers was revealed. According to coaches' assessments, such devices provide real-time monitoring of dynamic and kinematic parameters of movements, convenient data collection, and increased athlete motivation through results visualization. The implementation of such devices is an effective tool for planning and monitoring the training process.
skiing, speed-strength preparedness, sports biomechanics, kinematic parameters of movements, dynamic parameters of movements
1. Sandbakk Ø., Holmberg H. C. (2014), “A reappraisal of success factors for Olympic cross-country skiing”, International Journal of Sports Physiology and Performance, V. 9 (1), pp. 117–121, DOIhttps://doi.org/10.1123/ijspp.2013-0373.
2. Losnegard T. (2019), “Energy system contribution during competitive cross-country skiing”, European Journal of Applied Physiology, V. 119 (8), pp. 1675–1690, DOIhttps://doi.org/10.1007/s00421-019-04158-x.
3. Weakley J., Mann B., Banyard H. [et al.] (2021), “Velocity-based training: From theory to application”, Strength & Conditioning Journal, V. 43 (2), pp. 31–49, DOIhttps://doi.org/10.1519/SSC.0000000000000560.
4. Jovanović M., Flanagan E. P. (2014), “Researched applications of velocity based strength training”, Journal of Australian Strength and Conditioning, V. 22 (2), pp. 58–69.
5. Mitter B., Hölbling D., Bauer P. [et al.] (2021), “Concurrent validity of field-based diagnostic technology monitoring movement velocity in powerlifting exercises”, Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research, V. 35 (8), pp. 2170–2178, DOIhttps://doi.org/10.1519/JSC.0000000000003143.
6. Suchomel T. J., Kissick C. R., Techmanski B. S. [et al.] (2025), “Velocity-based training with weightlifting derivatives: Barbell and system velocity comparisons”, Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research, V. 39 (2), pp. 135–146, DOIhttps://doi.org/10.1519/JSC.0000000000004962.
7. Hernández-Belmonte A., Alegre L. M., Courel-Ibáñez J. (2023), “Velocity-based resistance training in soccer: Practical applications and technical considerations”, Strength and Conditioning Journal, V. 45 (2), pp. 140–148, DOIhttps://doi.org/10.1519/SSC.0000000000000707.
8. Zhang M., Liang X., Huang W. [et al.] (2023), “The effects of velocity-based versus percentage-based resistance training on athletic performances in sport-collegiate female basketball players”, Frontiers in Physiology, V. 13, e992655, DOIhttps://doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2022.992655.
9. Golovachev A. I., Butulov E. L., Kolykhmatov V. I. [et al.] (2018), “Modern methodological approaches to monitoring physical fitness in cross-country skiing”, Bulletin of Sports Science, V. 5, pp. 11–17.
10. Gurskiy A. V. (2015), “Pedagogical Concept of Managing the System of Motor Actions of Cross-Country Skiers”, abstract of Doctoral dissertation in Pedagogical Sciences, Smolensk, 50 p.
11. Seshadri D. R., Li R. T., Voos J. E. [et al.] (2019), “Wearable sensors for monitoring the internal and external workload of the athlete”, NPJ Digital Medicine, V. 2, p. 71, DOIhttps://doi.org/10.1038/s41746-019-0149-2.
12. Bourdon P. C., Cardinale M., Murray M. [et al.] (2017), “Monitoring athlete training loads: Consensus statement”, International Journal of Sports Physiology and Performance, V. 12 (S2), S2161-S2170, DOIhttps://doi.org/10.1123/IJSPP.2017-0208.
