employee from 01.01.2024 until now
Astana, Kazakhstan
The purpose of the study is to identify the characteristics of mental preparedness in high-level speed climbers and to determine typical patterns of relationships between psychological indicators. Research methods and organization. Eighteen athletes of the national team were examined in 2024 during the training camp in Tyumen. A comprehensive methodology for assessing mental skills was used, including scales of visualization, stress resistance, and motivation. Descriptive statistics and qualitative analysis of profiles were applied. Research results and conclusions. A dominance of high levels of visualization, engagement, and self-efficacy, constituting a stable core of readiness, has been identified. Deficits have been recorded in planning, activities under stress, and relationships with the coach. Systemic interconnections have been revealed: problems in interaction with the coach cascade into demotivation and deterioration in planning. Socio-psychological factors significantly modify regulatory processes, creating risks of reduced performance. A direct connection between visualization and confidence in actions has been confirmed. Mental preparedness is characterized by a developed cognitive-regulatory core in the presence of latent socio-psychological risks. The implementation of targeted programs for communication correction and goal-setting skills within the training system is required to enhance the reliability of results.
sport climbing, speed climbing, psychological preparation, mental skills, visualization, stress resistance, high-level athletes
1. Durand-Bush N., Salmela J.H., Green-Demers I. (2001), “The Ottawa Mental Skills Assessment Tool (OMSAT-3)”, The Sport Psychologist, Vol. 15 (1), pp. 1–19, DOI:https://doi.org/10.1123/tsp.15.1.1.
2. Weinberg R. S., Gould D. (2019), “Foundations of Sport and Exercise Psychology”, 7th ed., Champaign, IL, Human Kinetics, 680 p., ISBN 978-1-4925-7235-0.
3. Yurov I. A. (2016), “Personality in sport psychology”, Bulletin on Pedagogy and Psychology of South Siberia, No 3, pp. 45–49.
4. Drandrov G. L. (2023), “Features of aggression in women ingaged in sports”, Business. Education. Law, No 3 (64), pp. 492–496, DOIhttps://doi.org/10.25683/VOLBI.2023.64.752.
5. Andreev V. V., Stanislavskaya I. G. (2016), “Theoretical, methodological and practical aspects the psychology of coping in sport”, Sports psychologist, No. 3 (42), pp. 8–11.
6. Mangan K., Andrews K., Miles B. [et al.] (2015), “The psychology of rock climbing: A systematic review”, Psychology of sport and exercise, Vol. 76, p. 102763, DOIhttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychsport.2024.102763.
7. Turchetto M., Tomaselli V., Giorgi F. [et al.] (2025), “Sport climbing competence is influenced by psychological factors”, Frontiers in Psychology, Vol. 16, p. 1518495, DOIhttps://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1518495.
8. Swińarska N., Krężel P., Hapka A. [et al.] (2025), “Anxiety levels during sport climbing”, BMC Sports Sci Med Rehabil., Vol. 18 (1), p. 48, DOIhttps://doi.org/10.1186/s13102-025-01493-9.
9. Martin K., Collins L. (2025), “Emotion regulation in climbing”, Journal of Adventure Education and Outdoor Learning, Published online: 29 Dec 2025, pp. 1–27, DOIhttps://doi.org/10.1080/14729679.2025.2608938.
10. Lee Sheng Yen, Sa Man Kim, Ryang Suk Lee [et al.] (2024), “Effect of participation motivation in sports climbing on leisure satisfaction and self-efficacy”, Behavioral Sciences, V. 14, no. 1, p. 76, DOIhttps://doi.org/10.3390/su14010076.
11. Gürer H., Akçınar F., Arslan S. C. [et al.] (2024), “Evaluating the impact of rock climbing on mental health and emotional well-being in adolescents”, Frontiers in Psychology, Vol. 15, DOIhttps://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1426654, PMID: 39583002.
