employee from 01.01.2017 to 01.01.2025
Moscow, Russian Federation
The purpose of the study was to identify the level of validity and correlation of the results of expert student assessment of the quality of education and professionalism of the teaching staff of the Department of Physical Education and Life Safety of Moscow State University of Psychology and Education. The study involved 8 teachers of the department with different levels of qualifications (presence or absence of degrees and titles) and students of various specialties and areas of training, mainly psychological training. The quantitative indicators of students varied, since the study lasted for 2 years (4 semesters) and the permanent semester-long survey of students to evaluate the teaching staff of MSUPE was anonymous and fairly voluntary. The study of the effectiveness of classes was carried out both according to classical pedagogical parameters - general and motor density, physiological load curve, experience, qualifications, and the author’s method of reflection. The study revealed a tendency towards a decrease in the overall density of activities, variability in motor density depending on psychological states and other organizational factors, compensated by a tendency towards an increase in the level of the physiological load curve. In addition, a reliable high assessment by students of pedagogical influences during classes was revealed. The study revealed the utilitarian-consumer attitude of students towards the classes being conducted and their lack of personal attachment to a specific teacher. Their ineffectiveness in expert assessment was also revealed due to the almost complete absence of correlations for most classical indicators of pedagogical effectiveness
students, teaching staff, higher school, physical education and sports activities, expert assessment, physical culture, motor density of classes, reflection, physiological load curve
1. Boldov A. S., Karpov V. Yu. Metodika opredeleniya urovnya refleksii na zanyatiyah fizicheskoy kul'turoy i sportom. // Uchenye zapiski universiteta im. P. F. Lesgafta. 2021. No 9 (199). S. 23-26. DOI:https://doi.org/10.34835/issn.2308-1961.2021.9.p23-27 EDN: https://elibrary.ru/ACFWGY
2. Bugreeva A. S. Voprosy realizacii i povysheniya effektivnosti obratnoy svyazi v uchebnom processe v sfere vysshego professional'nogo obrazovaniya. // Mir nauki, kul'tury, obrazovaniya. 2023. No 4 (101). S. 142-144. DOI:https://doi.org/10.24412/1991-5497-2023-4101-142-144 EDN: https://elibrary.ru/EDVNVY
3. Ivanova P. E., Nefedova D. S., Frolov A. Yu. Opredelenie optimal'noy pul'sovoy zony v processe uchebnyh zanyatiy po fizicheskoy kul'ture v sportivnom zale // Nauchno-medicinskiy vestnik central'nogo Chernozem'ya. 2022. Tom XI, pr. 1. S. 44-46.
4. Boldov A. S., Gusev A. V., Il'kevich K. B., Sharagin V. I. Issledovanie vneshnih i vnutrennih psihologicheskih prichin otsutstviya motivacii studentov k zanyatiyam po fizicheskoy kul'ture v vuze// Uchenye zapiski universiteta im. P. F. Lesgafta. 2017. No 4 (146). S. 275-281. EDN: https://elibrary.ru/YNENKZ
5. Karpov V. Yu., Schedrin Yu. N., Schegolev V. A. Fizicheskaya kul'tura i sport kak faktory socializacii studencheskoy molodezhi // Nauchno-tehnicheskiy vestnik Sankt-Peterburgskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta informacionnyh tehnologiy, mehaniki i optiki. 2004. No 12. S. 215-218. EDN: https://elibrary.ru/JVAYOB
6. Karpov V. Yu. Upravlenie vospitaniem studentov s ispol'zovaniem sredstv fizicheskoy kul'tury i sporta: avtoref. dis. ... d-ra ped. nauk. Sankt-Peterburg, 2005. 39 s. EDN: https://elibrary.ru/NICNDZ
7. Korenev A. A. Obratnaya svyaz' v obuchenii i pedagogicheskom obschenii // Rhema. Rema. 2018. No 2. S. 112-127. EDN: https://elibrary.ru/UTSFST
8. Polupanova E. G. Ocenka studentami prepodavateley universitetov: mirovoy opyt // Vysheyshaya shkola. 2020. No 1 (135). S. 41-44. EDN: https://elibrary.ru/EGSFSX
9. Stark P. Expert Report on Student Evaluations of Teaching (Faculty Course Surveys) // The Ryerson Faculty Association and The Ontario Confederation of University Faculty Associations. 10 Oct. 2016. 11 p. URL: https://ocufa.on.ca/assets/RFA.v.Ryerson_Stark.Expert. Report.2016.pdf (data obrascheniya: 08.12.2023).
10. Spooren P., Brockx B., Mortelmans D. On the validity of student evaluation of teaching: The state of the art // Review of Educational Research. 2013. Vol. 83, No 4. P. 598-642.
