employee
Russian Federation
student from 01.01.2022 until now
15.31
The purpose of the study is to analyze the characteristics of development and adaptation of sports university students to the conditions of environmental change through nonverbal manifestations of personality traits (comparing them with the personality typology of K.G. Jung). Research methods and organization. The analysis of self-portraits and testing results based on the Keirsey methodology of first-year students at a sports university were the fundamental areas of research. An attempt was made to establish relationships between the parameters, personality types, and sports rankings of students, as well as their characteristics over time (comparative statistics of self-portraits of female students and girls aged 6-8 engaged in rhythmic gymnastics). Research results and conclusions. The main components of the personality of students engaged in aesthetic sports have been identified: extraversion, prioritization of sensations as leading mental processes, aggressiveness, demonstrativeness, anxiety and fears, the mutual influence of perfectionism and workaholism, unreasonable relationships with the body, and a low level of emotionality. The problematic aspects of motivational-behavioral characteristics include the need for protective control and security, loss of body schema, and a decline in ambition and involvement in current activities, which are characteristic of adaptation in the sports environment of higher education institutions.
pedagogical psychology, personal characteristics, aesthetic sports, projective method "Self-portrait", Keirsey method, identity, professional deformations, students
1. Podgornaya Y. N., Karlyshev V. M., Paraskevich O. V. (2016), “Psychological profile of an athlete's personality in rhythmic gymnastics”, Scientific notes of Lesgaft University, No 11, pp. 288–294.
2. Makhover K. (2003), “Projective drawing of a person”, Moscow, Sense, 157 p.
3. Meshcheryakov B. G., Zinchenko V. P., ed. (2009), “The Great Psychological Dictionary”, 4th ed., St. Petersburg, Prime-EUROZNAK, 811 p.
4. Vdovina D. V., Ogorodova T. V. (2013), “Volitional organization and accentuation of the personality sphere of adolescent athletes”, Bulletin of ChelSU, No 26, pp. 31–33.
5. Perera H. (2019), “Does the coach leadership behavior mediate the influence of factors affecting coach leadership behavioral styles on team success?”, International Journal of Human Movement and Sports Sciences, Vol. 7 (3), pp. 51–57.
6. Dubovova A. A., Shukshov S. V., Voronovich A. P., Ivanasova V. I. (2021), “Features of the relationship between parental attitude to sports and indicators of motivation and perfectionism of young athletes”, Physical culture, sport – science and practice, No 4, pp. 106–110.
7. Dimura I. N., Kosalapova D. A. (2023), “Attitude to the body: a comparative analysis of data from a survey of students of a sports university engaged in aesthetic sports”, XXV All-Russian Student Scientific and Practical Conference of Nizhnevartovsk State University, Nizhnevartovsk, pp. 59–65.
8. Dimura I. N., Bondarenko D. A. (2024), “Analysis of the emotional sphere of representatives of aesthetic sports”, Materials of the IV Regional Scientific and Practical Conference dedicated to the 300th anniversary of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Lugansk, May 24, 2024, Lugansk, pp. 21–24.
