Russian Federation
CSCSTI 14.35
The purpose of the study is to determine the influence that reflexive interaction methods have on the adaptation process of first-year university students. Research methods and organization. For the purpose of addressing research objectives, a combination of theoretical and empirical methods was employed: analysis of psychological and pedagogical literature, surveys, and testing. The diagnostic tools used included: "Adaptation of First-Year University Students" (O.A. Molokova), "Adaptation of First-Year Students at University" (T.D. Dubovitskaya, A.V. Krylova), and "Time Management" (F.J. Zimbardo). The study was conducted at Irkutsk State University with undergraduate and graduate students. Research results and conclusions. The effectiveness of applying reflexive methods of interaction during the adaptation period of first-year students to the learning process in higher education has been proven. The reflexive component of adaptation has been revealed, with emphasis placed on the fact that it can be leading in the process of student adaptation in higher education. Reflexive methods of working with students during the adaptation period help redirect the focus of the student's self-analysis from the external environment to oneself, share responsibility for what occurs within the group, assist in independently building a development plan, and teach time management skills. Reflexive methods of interaction help students learn to correlate their resources with those of their classmates, understand each other's problems, and provide support in challenging academic and extracurricular situations.
higher education, student interaction, student adaptation, reflexive methods, educational support
1. Elgina L. S. (2010), “Social adaptation of students at university”, Bulletin of BSU. Education. Personality. Society, No. 5, pp. 162–166.
2. Aseev V. G. (2000), “Theoretical aspects of the problem of adaptation”, Man and Society, No. 4, pp. 3–17.
3. Arkhipova A. A. (2007), “Adaptation of students as one of the conditions for personal self-realization”, Pedagogical sciences, No. 3, pp. 173–177.
4. Molokova O. A., Usheva T. F. (2013), “Psychological and pedagogical support for students at the stage of training at a linguistic university”, Siberian Pedagogical Journal, No. 2, pp. 101–106.
5. Galdikas L. N. (2022), “Adaptation of students as a necessary condition for their success in learning”, Kaliningrad Bulletin of Education, No 1 (13), pp. 26–31.
6. Degtyareva I. I., Volokitina V. A. (2022), “The problem of adaptation of first-year students to the educational process of a higher educational institution”, School of the Future, No. 2, pp. 196–206, DOIhttps://doi.org/10.55090/19964552_2022_2_196_205.
7. Usheva T. F. (2017), “The role of teachers in reflective support of students in the educational process”, Bulletin of the South Ural State University. Series: Education. Pedagogical sciences, Vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 42–45, DOIhttps://doi.org/10.14529/ped170106.
8. O’Neill T. A., Hoffart G. C., Mclarnon M. J. W. [et al.] (2017), “Constructive controversy and reflexivity training promotes effective conflict profiles and team functioning in student learning teams”, Academy of Management Learning & Education, Vol. 16, No. 2, pp. 257–276, DOIhttps://doi.org/10.5465/amle.2015.0183.
9. Thorpe M. (2000), “Encouraging students to reflect as part of the assignment process”, Active Learning in Higher Education, Vol. 1, No. 1, pp. 79–92, DOIhttps://doi.org/10.1177/1469787400001001006.
10. Pogodaeva M. V., Mikhailova E. K., Usheva T. F. (2019), “The use of Reflexive Approach in Distance Education of Students at Teacher-training Institutions”, ICDEL 2019, materials of the IV International Conference on Distance Education and Training (Shanghai, China, 24 –27 may 2019), Shanghai, pp. 1–5, ISBN 978-1-4503-6265-8, DOIhttps://doi.org/10.1145/3338147.3338148.
11. Fedosova I. V., Usheva T. F., Berinskaya I. V., Kibalnik A. V., Gordina O. V. (2017), “Healthy lifestyle of modern university students: new methods of diagnosis and development”, Man in India, Vol. 97, No 15, pp. 539–558.
