Russian Federation
One of the main conditions for increasing the efficiency of the educational process, within the framework of the modern concept of education, was recognized as a change in the positions of the lecturer and students. The change in the educational paradigm is characterized by a transition from pedagogy of influence to pedagogy of interaction. The relevance of the article is due to the need to specify the conditions for increasing the effectiveness of the educational process of physical education in universities. The choice of an education model is determined by the personal and professional position of the lecturer, and the learning results depend primarily on the personal qualities of the lecturer and secondly on the methods used. The results of a pilot study conducted at the bases of railway universities of the Russian Federation showed that training within the traditional system is carried out by lecturers with lower qualifications. t has been revealed that the transition to a developmental education system does not always lead to the formation of a “subject-subject” position in the “lecturer-student” relationship. Most students studying within the traditional system perceive the lecturer as an official who organizes his activities within a strict disciplinary framework. In the conditions of developmental education, students characterize the lecturer as an enterprising person who is sensitive to mistakes and shortcomings, who sets a high emotional rhythm in classes, which contributes to the development of students’ creativity.
position of the lecturer and students, subject-object and subject-subject relations, traditional and developmental education systems
1. Barak O. L. (1994), “Formation of the personality positions of teacher and student in a situation of joint productive activity “, Materials of the 1st scientific and practical seminar of psychologists and OSHO “Innovative training and practice”, Moscow State University Publishing House, pp. 129–140.
2. Lerner I. Ya. (1996), “Developmental education from a didactic perspective“, Pedagogy, No. 2, pp. 8–12.
3. Rudneva T. I. (2002), “Pedagogy of professionalism “, Samara, SSU, 220 p.
4. Vaseltsova I. A., Belov D. O., Cherepanova M. A. (2019), “Analysis of approaches to the implementation of personality-oriented education“, Science and education in transport, No. 2, pp. 233–235.
5. Slastenin V. A. (2004), “Subjective-activity approach in general and vocational education“, Strategy of education in the educational system of Russia: approaches, problems, Publishing Service Agency, pp. 155–162.
