employee from 01.01.2010 until now
Russian Federation
student from 01.01.2021 until now
UDC 159.9.07
CSCSTI 15.00
CSCSTI 15.21
Russian Classification of Professions by Education 37.00.00
Russian Classification of Professions by Education 37.03.01
Russian Library and Bibliographic Classification 883
Russian Library and Bibliographic Classification 8837
Russian Trade and Bibliographic Classification 83
Russian Trade and Bibliographic Classification 831
BISAC PSY PSYCHOLOGY
BISAC PSY000000 General
BISAC PSY021000 Industrial & Organizational Psychology
BISAC PSY023000 Personality
The purpose of the study is to identify differences in leadership style indicators, professional identity, and coping behavior strategies among management students and working professionals in the field of management and administration. Research methods and organization. The research sample consists of two groups: practicing managers and students majoring in management and administration-related fields. The following methodologies were used: The Multifactor Leadership Questionnaire by B. Bass and B. Avolio; Professional Identity/Marginalism by E.P. Ermolaeva; and Stress Coping Strategies by C. Hobfoll, adapted by N.E. Vodopyanova and E.S. Starchenkova. Research results and conclusions. Significant differences were identified only in preferred coping behavior strategies. Based on the results of discriminant analysis, a model for differentiating managers was constructed for the first time, which can be further used to predict the level of professionalization. The obtained results contribute to the understanding of leadership styles and the professional identity of managers through their correlation with coping behavior models.
psychology of professional activity, leadership styles, professional identity, coping behavior models, differentiation model, managers
1. Balina T. N. (2021), “Analysis of professionally important qualities of a manager in the structure of acmeological potential”, Bulletin of the Taganrog Institute of Management and Economics, No. 2 (34), pp. 79–83.
2. Golyanich V. M., Bondarchuk A. F., Tulupieva T. V. (2018), “Psychological predictors of professional competence of sales managers”, Scientific notes of the Lesgaft University, No. 9 (163), pp. 325–330.
3. Korogodin V. S. (2023), “Modern approaches to the study of leadership”, International Scientific Research Journal, No. 8 (134), pp. 40–45, DOIhttps://doi.org/10.23670/IRJ.2023.134.98.
4. Balabanova E. S., Deminskaya V. E. (2017), “The manager as a transformational leader: the role of personal qualities and management practices”, Russian Management Journal, Vol. 15, No. 3, pp. 263–288, DOIhttps://doi.org/10.21638/11701/spbu18.2017.301.
5. Vodopyanova N. E., Starchenkova E. S. (2010), “Stress management: present and future”, Psychological support for professional activity: theory and practice, St. Petersburg, Rech Publishing House, pp. 554–597, ISBN 978-5-9268-0992-0.
6. Shiyanovskaya I. A. (2021), “Coping strategies of managers with varying levels of success in joint management activities”, Society: sociology, psychology, pedagogy, No. 3 (83), pp. 85–89, DOIhttps://doi.org/10.24158/spp.2021.3.14.
7. Hobfoll S. E., Dunahoo C. L., Ben-Porath Y. [et al.] (1994), “Gender and coping: The dual-axis model of coping”, American journal of community psychology, Vol. 22, No. 1, pp. 49–82, https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02506817.
8. Vodopyanova N. E., Kapustina A. N. (2008), “Coping strategies as a factor in professional adaptation”, Bulletin of Leningrad State University named after A.S. Pushkin, Vol. 5, Psychology, No. 1, pp. 73–82.
9. Ivanova N. L. (2009), “Professional identity as a factor in personal competitiveness in modern business”, Modernisation of the Economy and Globalisation, Proceedings of the IX International Scientific Conference, Moscow, pp. 383–390.
10. Shneider L. B. (2001), “Professional identity: structure, genesis and conditions of formation”, abstract of dissertation ... Doctor of Psychology, Moscow, 42 p.
11. Ermolaeva E. P. (2017), “Multidisciplinary approach in the ‘person-profession-society’ model”, Institute of Psychology of the Russian Academy of Sciences. Organisational psychology and psychology of labour, Vol. 2, No. 1, pp. 3–22.
12. Korneeva O. D., Semenov K. B. (2022), “Leadership as the basis for the formation of managerial competence”, Problems of modern pedagogical education, No. 74, pp. 121–124.
13. Korchagin E. N. (2023), “Professional identity: a review of foreign research”, Pedagogy and Psychology of Education, No. 1, pp. 190–203, DOIhttps://doi.org/10.31862/2500-297X-2023-1-190-203.
14. Gluhanyuk N. S. (2005), “Psychology of teacher professionalization”, 2nd ed., supp., Yekaterinburg, Russian State Pedagogical University Publishing House, 261 p., ISBN 5-8050-0115-2.
15. Gryazeva-Dobshinskaya V. G., Dmitrieva Yu. A., Glukhov P. S., Glukhova V. A. (2015), “Innovative leadership and psychometric problems of its diagnosis”, Psychology. Psychophysiology, Vol. 8, No. 2, pp. 14–24.
16. Krayushkina N. A. (2016), “The relationship between socio-psychological adaptation and coping behaviour in professional activity”, Bulletin of Moscow State Linguistic University. Education and Pedagogical Sciences, No. 1 (763), pp. 95–103.
17. Gryazeva-Dobshinskaya V. G., Dmitrieva Yu. A., Korobova S. Yu., Glukhova V. A. (2023), “Personal resources and barriers to innovative leadership among managers: structural aspects of motivation, leadership style, social identity”, Organisational Psychology, Vol. 13, No. 3, pp. 9–28, DOIhttps://doi.org/10.17323/2312-5942-2023-13-3-9-28.
