Russian Federation
employee from 01.01.2019 to 01.01.2026
Moskow, Moscow, Russian Federation
The purpose of the study is to evaluate the impact of a neural network-based engagement dynamics assessment system combined with simulation-based learning on the formation of professional competencies of future teachers during trial lessons at Moscow City University (MCU). Research methods: analysis and synthesis of scientific-methodological literature, pedagogical experiment, and methods of mathematical statistics. Research results and conclusions. Based on the experience of Moscow City University (MCU), the comprehensive influence of interconnected components on the conduct of trial lessons by students is examined: the "Digital Mirror" service, an expert assessment system, and simulation training using specialized simulators. Each of these components makes a unique contribution to the formation of professional competencies of the future teacher, and their integration creates a synergistic effect that significantly enhances the quality of student preparation. It is concluded that an integrated approach is necessary, combining objective data from artificial intelligence (AI), expert assessment, and simulation simulators in the process of preparing students at a pedagogical university.
higher pedagogical education, simulation training, expert assessment, model lesson, assessment metrics, artificial intelligence, professional competencies
1. Aigunova O. A., Ilicheva S. A., Lesin S. M. [et al.] (2018), “The method of analyzing video recordings of educational classes as a tool for evaluating a teacher's professional activity”, Interactive Education, No. 2, pp. 52–56, DOIhttps://doi.org/10.23859/1994-0637-2020-2-95-17.
2. Artishcheva L. V., Ustin P. N., Popov L. M., Alishev T. B. (2022), “Neural network assessment of the dynamics of students’ involvement in the educational process in the conditions of distance learning”, Psychology. Historical and critical reviews and modern research, Vol. 11, No. 2A, pp. 103–112, DOIhttps://doi.org/10.34670/AR.2022.47.96.008.
3. Kasatkina D. A., Kravchenko A. M., Kupriyanov R. B., Nekhorosheva E. V. (2020), “Automatic Recognition of Engagement in Education: A Critical Review of Research”, Modern Foreign Psychology, Vol. 9, No. 3, pp. 59–68, DOIhttps://doi.org/10.17759/jmfp.2020090305.
4. Fomina T. G., Potanina A. M., Morosanova V. I. (2020), “The Relationship between School Engagement and Self-Regulation of Academic Activities: State of the Problem and Research Prospects in Russia and Abroad”, Bulletin of the Peoples' Friendship University of Russia. Series: Psychology and Pedagogy, Vol. 17, No. 3, pp. 390–411, DOIhttps://doi.org/10.22363/2313-1683-2020-17-3-390-411.
5. Afanasyeva Zh. V., Bogdanova A. V., Kupriyanov R. B., Nikitina T. A. (2025), “Development of Digital Mirror Metrics for Evaluating a Learning Activity”, Hominum, No. 3 (19), pp. 43–66.
6. Klarin M. V. (2018), “Innovative Models of Education: A Study of Global Experience”, Monograph, 2nd edition, Moscow, Luch, 640 p., ISBN 978-5-88915-113-5.
7. Kokareva Z. A. (2021), “Where is the Didactics, or What Do the Lessons of the Contestants of the "Teacher of the Year of Russia" Teach?”, People's Education, No. 4 (1487), pp. 117–122.
8. Makhmutov M. I. (2016), “Selected Works”, In 7 volumes, vol. 4: Modern Lesson and Pedagogical Technologies for Developing Thinking Kazan, Magarif – Vakyt, 375 p., ISBN 978-5-905943-97-3.
9. Sergomanov P. A., Maltsev M. A., Bysik N. V., Beketov V. Yu., Bayburin R. F. (2023), “Sociology of the Lesson: Discursive Organization of Effective Teacher Practices”, Educational Studies Moscow, No. 1, pp. 191–218, DOIhttps://doi.org/10.17323/1814-9545-2023-1-191-218.
10. Kochagina M. N., Kochagin V. V. (2025), “Independent assessment of the Competencies of Future Mathematics Teachers at the Moscow State Pedagogical University”, Fundamental Problems of Teaching Mathematics, Computer Science, and Informatization of Education, Collection of Abstracts of the XI International Scientific and Practical Conference within the Framework of the International Scientific and Educational Forum "Mathematics. Computer Science. Education", Yelets-Vladikavkaz, June 29–July 5, 2025, Yelets, I.A. Bunin Yelets State University, pp. 64–66.
11. Nikitina E. K., Fortunatov A. A., Lvova A. S., Rytov A. I. (2025), “Methodology of using simulation training aimed at creating an effective educational environment at the university”, World of Science, Culture, and Education, No. 6 (115), pp. 380–386, DOIhttps://doi.org/10.24412/1991-5497-2025-6115-380-386.
12. Chernikova O., Heitzmann N., Holzberger D., Seidel T., Stadler M., Fischer F. (2020), “Simulation-based learning in higher education: A meta-analysis”, Review of Educational Research, V. 90 (4), pp. 499–541, DOIhttps://doi.org/10.3102/0034654320933544.
13. Dalinger T., Lee K., Hunter R., Jenne K. (2020), “A mixed reality simulation offers strategic practice for pre-service teachers”, Computers & Education, V. 144, e103696, DOIhttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2019.103696.
