Izhevsk, Izhevsk, Russian Federation
Perm', Perm, Russian Federation
CSCSTI 14.01
The purpose of the study is to identify the pedagogical conditions for the development of risk management in educational design among university students who are future educators. Research methods and organization. Methods of observation, testing, surveying, expert evaluation, assessment of project work, and evaluation of case study solutions were employed. The developed pedagogical conditions were tested in the educational process for higher education programs in "Pedagogical Education" (bachelor's and master's degrees). The dynamics of changes in risk management criteria were recorded among undergraduate and graduate students studying pedagogical fields. Research results and conclusions. It has been revealed that the reliable development of risk management in the educational design of university students is possible under the implementation of a number of pedagogical conditions: the educational process is built on the basis of a developed risk management system, which includes four components – target, conceptual-content, structural-functional, and procedural-resultant; didactic units reflecting elements of the risk management system are integrated into all educational blocks of the educational programs and cover the entire period of study; each didactic unit is structured into three main parts – cognitive, practical, and control; consideration of factors related to the deferral of risks in educational projects in the educational process. The construction of the educational process, taking into account these pedagogical conditions, has led to statistically significant changes in the development of risk management among university students. The results of the experimental study suggest that the identified pedagogical conditions and their implementation contribute to the development of risk management in educational design among students.
higher pedagogical education, bachelor's degree, master's degree, pedagogical conditions, risk management, educational design
1. Bek U. (2000), “Risk Society. On the way to another modernity”, Moscow, Progress-Tradition, 384 p.
2. “The UN Report "Our World at Risk: Transforming Governance for a Sustainable Future", URL: https://www.weforum.org/reports/global-risks-report-2022 (date of access: 02.20.2024).
3. Ivanov O. B. (2020), “Global risks and new challenges of human civilization”, STAGE: Economic theory, analysis, practice, No. 2, pp. 7–20, DOIhttps://doi.org/10.24411/2071-6435-2020-10009.
4. Kameneva E. A., Kiseleva N. I., Selivanova M. A., Uzumova N. V. (2023), “National projects and programs in the field of education in Russia: awareness and expectations of participants in the educational process”, Perspectives of science and education, No. 6 (66), pp. 689–706, DOIhttps://doi.org/10.32744/pse.2023.6.40.
5. “Key directions for the development of Russian education to achieve the goals and objectives of sustainable development in the education system until 2035”, URL: http://edu2035.firo-nir.ru/index.php/stati-opublikovannye-uchastnikami-soobshchestva/86-klyuchevye-napravleniya-2035 (date of request: 01.02.2024).
6. “Passport of the national project "Education", URL: http:// www.econom22.ru/pnp/natsionalnye-proekty-programmy/Education.pdf (date of application: 02.20.2024).
7. Ministry of Labor and Social Protection of the Russian Federation (2013), “Order of the dated 04/29/2013 N 170n "On approval of methodological recommendations for the development of a professional standard", URL: https://www.consultant.ru/document/cons_doc_LAW_150886/.
8. Dezhina I. G., Efimova G. Z. (2022), “Risks of Project 5-100: assessments of scientific and pedagogical workers of different generations”, Higher education in Russia, Vol. 31, No. 3, pp. 28–39, DOIhttps://doi.org/10.31992/0869-3617-2022-31-3-28-39.
9. Prychinin A. E. (2023), “Risks of educational projects: essence and patterns”, monograph, Izhevsk, Udmurt University, 284 p.
10. Utemov V. V., Yershova S. V. (2021), “Risk management in educational projects and programs”, Scientific and methodological electronic journal "Concept", No. 03 (March), pp. 97–107, URL: http://e-koncept.ru/2021/211017.html.
11. Antonova L. N. (2010), “Pedagogical riskology: theory and history”, Problems of modern education, No. 4, pp. 24–30.
12. Belyaeva M. A. (2014), “Risk as a subject of scientific analysis in pedagogy and education”, Teacher education in Russia, No. 11, pp. 16–23.
13. Boguslavskiy M. V. (2015), “The potential of pedagogical riskology in the education system”, ASOU Conference, collection of scientific papers and materials of scientific and practical conferences, Moscow, No. 1, pp. 1394–1402.
14. Konstantinova L. V., Titova E. S., Petrov A.M., Troska Z. A., Nikonova O. D. (2023), “Changing vectors of international cooperation between Russian universities in a new geopolitical situation”, Integration of education, Vol. 27, No. 4 (113), pp. 554–573, DOIhttps://doi.org/10.15507/1991-9468.113.027.202304.554-573.
15. Pinchuk A. N., Karepova S. G., Tikhomirov D. A. (2022), “Transprofessional education in student discourse: relevance, expectations, risks”, Education and Science, Vol. 24, No. 3, pp. 184–220, https://doi.org/10.17853/1994-5639-2022-3-184-220.
16. Varzhapetyan A. G. Markelova N. V. (2013), “Risk management of educational projects in the field of additional professional education”, Bulletin of the Moscow State Technical University named after G.I. Nosov, No. 1, pp. 108–111.
17. Lomakina O. V. (2018), “Risk management in the implementation of an educational project”, Higher education today, No. 10, pp. 64–72, DOIhttps://doi.org/10.25586/RNU.HET.18.10.P.64.
18. Khodyreva E. A. (2017), “Problems of risk management of innovative educational projects”, Scientific and methodological electronic journal "Concept", No. 2 (February), pp. 165–172, URL: http://e-koncept.ru/2017/170048.htm.
19. Kataev K. S., Kataev S. G., Kamenskaya I. V. (2023), “On the principles of constructing a model of a graduate specialist in a pedagogical university”, Education and Science, Vol. 25, No. 3, pp. 35–66, https://doi.org/10.17853/1994-5639-2023-3-35-66.
20. Novopashina L. A., Grigorieva E. G., Ilyina N. F., Bidus I. A. (2024), “The readiness of future teachers to work in school: a review of theoretical and empirical research”, Education and Science, Vol. 26, No. 2, pp. 59–96, DOIhttps://doi.org/10.17853/1994-5639-2024-2-60-96.
21. Amunga J. (2021), “Leveraging technology to enhance STEM Education Amidst the Covid-19 pandemic: An overview of pertinent concerns”, Technium Social Sciences Journal, V. 18 (1), pp. 40–55, https://doi.org/10.47577/tssj.v18i1.3044.
22. Deshmukh G. K., Hory S. M., Devi Prasad U. (2020), “Risk Management in Global CRM IT Projects”, Business Perspectives and Research, Vol. 8, Issue 2, https://doi.org/10.1177/22785337198870.
23. Harutyunyan S. H., Terteryan A. A. (2024), “Organization of safety culture formation and disaster risk management process in the university system. Chgnazhamajin kaŗavarum ev tekhnologianer”, Crisis Management State Academy, pp. 123–131, DOIhttps://doi.org/10.61746/18292984-2024.1-143.
24. Trinidad J. E. (2023), “Rethinking School Improvement Organizations: Understanding Their Variety, Benefits, Risks, and Future Directions”, Educational Researcher, V. 52 (6), DOIhttps://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X231179116.
25. Yemini M., Oplatka I., Sagie N. (2018), “Project Monitoring, Control, and Evaluation: The Unique Aspects of Projects in Schools”, Project Management in Schools, Palgrave Pivot, Cham., https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-78608-7_6.
26. Soto J. E., Mercado O. M., De la Hoz Reyes R. (2021), “Diverser a project of inclusive education from and for diversity”, Technium Social Sciences Journal, V. 26 (1), pp. 338–350, https://doi.org/10.47577/tssj.v26i1.5326.
27. Sumual H., Sumilat J. M. (2022), “Unima risk management development”, Technium Social Sciences Journal, V. 28b(1), pp. 489–496, https://doi.org/10.47577/tssj.v28i1.5460.
28. Waguaf A., Benabbou R., Benhra J. (2023), “A Risk Management Based on Artificial Intelligence Tools and Multi-criteria Decision Making Methods: Systematic Literature Review”, Artificial Intelligence and Industrial Applications, Masrour T., El Hassani I., Barka N. (eds), vol. 771, Springer, Cham., pp. 251–270, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-43524-9_18.
29. Prychinin A. E. (2024), “The structure of the risk competence of future teachers”, Science of man: Humanitarian Research (pedagogical sciences), Vol. 18, No. 4, pp. 140–150, DOIhttps://doi.org/10.57015/issn1998- 5320.2024.18.4.14.
30. Prychinin A. E. (2024), “Risk management models of educational projects in the structure of an educational organization”, Scientific and methodological electronic journal "Concept", No. 6 (June), URL: http://e-koncept.ru/2024/241082.htm, DOIhttps://doi.org/10.24412/2304-120X-2024-11082.
31. Prychinin A. E. (2023), “Patterns of risk development of educational projects”, Psychological and pedagogical facilitation in the context of digital transformation of education, a collective monograph, Udmurt State University, Izhevsk, pp. 6–25.
32. Prychinin A. E. (2024), “Identification and risk minimization of educational projects”, Yaroslavl Pedagogical Bulletin, No. 1 (136), pp. 36–42, DOIhttps://doi.org/10.20323/1813-145X_2024_1_136_36.
33. Prychinin A. E. (2024), “Development of approaches to risk management of educational projects”, Values and meanings, No. 1 (89), pp. 95–111, DOIhttps://doi.org/10.24412/2071-6427-2024-1-95-111.
34. Prychinin A. E. (2024), “Development of the risk competence of the subject of an educational project (substantive aspect)”, Bulletin of Orenburg State University, No. 3 (243), pp. 48–55, DOIhttps://doi.org/10.25198/1814-6457-243-48.
